Media Rant #0983098
When they serve up their regular tosh about cricket, they get easily found out.
Spot the difference.
Simple: The average man's intelligence with respect to cricket is pretty good.The same cannot be said about his/her knowledge about "worldly" topics. Of course the wiser among us are able to ridicule some of the things that come from the media. But that is a miniscule minority.
I guess the media would defend themselves by claiming that they are only doing their job of "encouraging debate". Well. They are correct on that front. They are encouraging debate. The issue is only in the way they are trying to. Which is disputable imo. The average cricketing fan knows the difference between a srikanth's opinion and a boycott's. But he/she may not be able to distinguish opinions with similar effectiveness in other topics. For instance, you and me are not experts to figure out whether outlook's or business today's methodology for ranking b schools is better. Of course, over a period of time we would be able to do it better than now. But, until a critical mass of people have that threshold level of intelligence, I am afraid that a large number of people would get misguided.