Saturday, March 31, 2007

What are england really cribbing about?

England tend to worry about the fact that their two "world class" players play in the same position - Gerrard and Lampard. What about Spain? they have Baraja Albelda Xavi Xabi Alonso Cesc Iniesta David Silva Guti Arteta. may be even that eccentric Ivan De La Pena. competing for 2, may be 3 spots. (did i miss out anyone?)

Charisma

Quentin Crisp said: charisma is the ability to influence without logic.

Wikipedia said:
The word
charisma (from the Greek word χάρισμα (kharisma), "gift" or "divine favor," from kharizesthai, "to favor," from kharis, "favor": see also charism) refers to a rare trait found in certain human personalities usually including extreme charm and a 'magnetic' quality of personality and/or appearance along with innate and powerfully sophisticated personal communicability and persuasiveness. Though very difficult or even impossible to define accurately (due to a lack of widely accepted criteria in regard to the trait), charisma is often used to describe an (elusive, even undefinable) personality trait that often includes the seemingly 'supernatural' or uncanny ability to lead, charm, persuade, inspire, and/or influence people. It refers especially to a quality in certain people who easily draw the attention and admiration (or even hatred if the charisma is negative) of others due to a 'magnetic' quality of personality and/or appearance. Though the term as it stands is extremely difficult to define, other similar terms/phrases related to charisma include: grace, exuberance, equanimity, mystique, positive energy, joie de vivre, extreme charm, personal magnetism, personal appeal, "electricity," and allure, among many others[1]. Usually many of these specific qualities must be present within a single individual for the person to be considered highly charismatic by the public and their peers.

My undergrad management lecturer said its "Cha-rish-ma" (sounds like karishma. or did he mean the same?)

Lovedale says: Its something i badly lack. Worse is the fact that its not something that can be learnt, imbibed and nurtured. :(

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Would u have thought differently if u were an Indian Cricket Fan?

The following is a letter to the Football 365 mailbox, by a disgruntled English football fan.

Forget Steve McClaren and the current crop of players. England as a nation has far more systemic and deep rooted problems than the present situation might suggest. It is our football culture that needs some serious thought, everything else is a reflection and consequence of that culture.

England is the wealthiest football nation on earth, and so I start with the premise that those who have propelled the FA, the clubs and the game as a whole to such a privileged position have every right to expect this country to be amongst the front runners and innovators of the world game. I often hear that we have no divine right to win tournaments, to have the best players, to play the highest quality of football, even to qualify for the finals in the summer every two years. It may be true that the right that we have is not divine, but we damn well do have a right to expect much more than we are currently experiencing.

There is little purpose in continuing to circumnavigate this blame game merry-go-round, everybody with an opinion, yet nothing ever changes. The blind leading the blind comes to mind. Ideally, we the fans could sit back and simply enjoy our football, proud of its culture, its history and heritage and our national team. After all, it is the FA's mandate to oversee the running of the game in this country.

In the twenty odd years that I have followed the sport I have seen little sign of competence from the FA, little vision for the game or ability to intellectualise what is required to reach the pinnacle. Football at the top level is all about an intellectual approach and having the vision to design and deliver a strategy for success.

It can hardly be a coincidence that none of the five best teams in this country are managed by an Englishman. The idea that they have simply not been given the chance is a fallacy. If we are totally honest, bar Manchester United, Chelsea, Liverpool, Arsenal and Tottenham, the rest of the Premiership is low on creativity, flair, style and tactical proficiency.

Bernado Corradi's description of our new Under-21 manager should ring loudly in our ears. So too should the cries from all those who were adamant that the new national team manager had to be English. In some games in the Premiership the ball is more like a hot potato than something that should be cared for and caressed. It makes absolutely no sense that the best teams in this country can manipulate the ball in a fashion to match Europe's best, yet almost exclusively the teams below claim that they can't compete so need to find other ways. Why is this not the case in virtually every other league in the world? Somebody still finishes tenth as well as bottom.

The media does not fill me with a great deal more confidence. What should be the bridge between those who manage the game and those who fund it has turned into nothing more than a vehicle for entertainment. All that power and ability to influence, yet detail is not its strong point, forensic analysis is non-existent. We live in an age where there has never been better ways of sharing information and ideas yet a controversial incident can lead to weeks of pointless discussion with the same bones picked over time and again.

The most popular newspapers lazily take up page after page describing who the next big transfer deal will involve only to claim something different a few weeks later. Why do people trust an organisation that only has an accuracy rate of about ten percent? Manchester United are linked with over £400 million worth of players every summer. The articles don't, however, leave it as just a link. Read the match reports in these newspapers and it's not uncommon that one incident takes up its entirety; the goals scored and the rest of the action are hastily crammed into one paragraph at the end. The language used is more suited to the Beano than an informative piece.

The television shows are full of bland characters, they are pressed with time and tell us mostly what we already know. The only show that examines action in some detail, Sky's 'The Last Word', is half an hour long and often only covers a couple of matches a week. Don't get me started on Groundhog day (Sky Sports News) and their 'investigations'. Sky only cover football from two countries, Spain and England, because they don't want ratings affected by showing games at the same time.

How are we supposed to gain a rounded knowledge of world football with only two countries to choose from? Where is the South American football, except in the middle of the night on Channel 5? The Copa Libertadores is one of the most interesting and exciting tournaments of the year. Few South American players, the most naturally gifted in the world, grace the Premiership. Instead, all of Latin America's best players light up the magnificent 'La Liga'. Even the teams at the bottom of other European Leagues have several South Americans, bought for little money, because they have more quality than your average Scandinavian. Ten minutes listening to Talksport is enough to realise that radio has little input in the media's ability to inform, educate and seriously debate the issues.

We should be listening to, and reading articles from, people who inspire us with their knowledge, descriptive qualities and ability to analyse and inform (Our ears are burning - Ed) about a game where a scratch beneath the surface reveals a hugely complex array of players, styles and tactics. It is worrying that the two British journalists that I respect above all others have lived abroad for many years. Tim Vickery in Rio and Graham Hunter in Barcelona. There is not an article or broadcast involving these two gentlemen where I don't feel as though I have furthered my football education.

"I'm not interested in furthering my football education," I hear you cry. That may be so but it still hurts the same to see this country underperform year after year and for the majority of all our lifetimes. If all of the above was in good order none of us would need to be well versed in the art of producing a successful football nation. But as with all areas of life it pays to be a responsible consumer and we are all consumers, the most dedicated on this lump of rock which we call home.

We cannot simply blame the FA, managers, players and the media. If a wife remains with an abusive husband it is highly unlikely that he will suddenly find a conscience and become the wonderful, caring man that she craves. The only true indicator that any of the above have that they are failing to reach even the minimum required performance is the profit margin.

I am in no way suggesting that people simply stop the feeding frenzy, we need first to nurture a sense of what is required ourselves. Knowledge is power, and anyway, how can we articulate our demands if the level of understanding of the average fan is substandard? The evidence of poorly informed fans is everywhere - the work rate and passion brigade seem to believe that a lack of quality players and tactical nous has nothing to do with it. Working hard and showing some passion (like players actually have none) is all you need, apparently. The fans who seem to believe that their clubs players are better than everyone else are just as bad. The public need to wake up and realise that they are an accomplice in this charade.

We have no other option than to use our financial muscle alongside a clear and concise message. The status quo is simply not acceptable, we have been treading water for far too long. A limited evaluation of youth football provides the evidence that we are failing to grasp even the basics after ten years of academies. Our future is at stake.

Somebody has to be at the top of the tree. Why not us, the wealthiest football nation on earth with the most passionate fans? We have underachieved for the majority of our history and allowed hundreds of millions of pounds of OUR money to be wasted. We cannot trust those whom we have entrusted our national obsession. Their record speaks for itself.

The truth is though, I fear that we are all the enemy of English football. As I said earlier, the blind leading the blind comes to mind.
Damian Phipps, Cheshire

What part of the above would be different to you, if you are an Indian Cricket team fan? Huh.

Monday, March 26, 2007

The obvious WC07 aftermath blog

interesting and crazy as it might seem. but i think the fans should shut the f**k up with their ideas on what should be done. they have the right to ask questions when the team is not performing. yes. but none of them are authoritative enough to give ideas. it would be pretty nice if u have 1 billion ideas. (my company would start drooling if it gets to know!). but cricket is not democracy.[and i am not even sure even organised democracy is working]. just like all ur workplace decision making.

and i am not even sure whether the fans have the right to claim its "their money" thats paying the team. bull shit. the bcci is not funded by the finance ministry/sports ministry. and we dont have any kinda merchandising funda like in football. [though with the $1B deal, Nike is trying to bring it in.] the only indirect influence they have on the players' bank balance is if they buy all the products they endorse. considering that all the products in the market are invariably endorsed by some cricketer or the other, it would be difficult to say whether u are having any kinda influence at all. so. just shut up about the money bit. they are just making the most of opportunities. if u had a chance to make a few crores just by eating biscuits for twenty seconds, what would u have done?

and the players represent the nation. yes. but would u shout at every under performance by anyone representing the nation? i understand emotions are involved. but just dont bring undue accountability.

and the media. just dont think that every test cricketer makes soundudgements.abs-fuckin-lute crap. do u really want me to give examples? and. when the media writes about the team being hyped and all that. dont they realise its only the media that can create this hype? and not just a sum total of random coffee table/dinner table conversations all over the country?

and one more small point. the fact that we have the best batting line up in the world on paper is absolutely right. we have three batsmen who have scored 10000 runs each in ODIs. 2 guys, yuvraj and dhoni have been in real good form for a while now. its just that ppl always misunderstand what 'on paper' means. it means based on statistics. and when u try to to infer things from statistics, make sure u have all the related numbers in your hand. and dont just make arbit statements like siddhu's "stats are mini skirts. they show more than they hide". as an engineer. i do know a bit about data and analysis. so. when u analyse. make sure u have all the data. dont just say that stats dont tell the whole story. crap. [though i agree the science is not perfect! :P anyways. i hope u get it]

just dont fuckin sound more authoritative than u deserve to. and know ur role and shut ur mouth!

bye bye mandira. hello Charlie Webster! :)

Monday, March 19, 2007

Why did djTemp happen?

Why did djTemp start right after placements and effectively on the last day of college? What would ve happened if it spilled over to bangalore? Sex??? no problesm. Marriage issue? Nah. If god didnt want me to marry her, and put me in a fix, it would ve gone on atleast till, say, 25. The timing of the relationship seems strange. Everything happens by design. There is nothing random.
Now. Why did god want her to be in my life in the first place? Wouldnt i have learnt all that I did even otherwise, considering my observation and analytical skills? So, it is not about a sneak preview of her kinda world. Is it just to remind me that my idea of "intelligent" females exist? possible. But not killer reason enough.
If it had gone on longer, what would i have lost? All those weekends of ccd/booze? Crap. I would ve, may be, learnt to prioritize relationships [vs time], and surely would ve managed everything even then given the amount of time i ve had.
The whole thing looks so programmed. Someone crying in front of me. Something that would very obviously would ve evoked a response from me. Best start possible? hmmm. Then some bits to screw up both ends. First K. then, just when it was looking like it might get back to normalcy, a misinterpretation of my relationship with Swetha. [ok. lets fuck the blaming bit.] Which effectively killed it.
Would i have lost track of my future plans? No way! Even football fan-dom, at its peak, will always have lesser priority for me than my future.
Then why did god want to relieve me of her at that point? Was she, by design, something nice to engage my mind during the whole of rotten (read as unproductive) final year? But even then i had lots of time to crib about how stupid final year was. Was she a tool to help me to become closer to some ppl and farther from some others? erm.. not good enough.
I am sure about this. Considering that the timing looks so suspiciously programmed, there is something significant to pick up from the journey. And i dont want to realize it when i am 29 or 49 or 79. I want to know it Now. NOW!